Artwork

コンテンツは Yonason Goldson によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Yonason Goldson またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Player FM -ポッドキャストアプリ
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!

Grappling with the Gray #62: Anything in a good cause?

38:55
 
シェア
 

Manage episode 376815205 series 3359707
コンテンツは Yonason Goldson によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Yonason Goldson またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

Does anything go for a good cause? Do the ends justify the means?
These are the questions that arise on this episode of Grappling with the Gray when Kimberly Davis, Diane Helbig, and Annette Taylor join the ethics panel.
Here is our topic:
For years, I’ve been an avid fan of behavioral economics professor Dan Ariely. I’ve often referenced his work on ethics and morals in my articles and discussions.
However, he is now under fire, accused of falsifying his research for a paper about how to make people more honest, on which he collaborated with Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. Professor Ariely insists that he did not manipulate the data in developing his thesis. Hartford Insurance, which provided the data, asserts that he did just that.
As the story unfolds, an investigative committee found Professor Gino guilty of misconduct. She has been placed on leave and faces the unprecedented possibility of being stripped of tenure. She has responded by launching a lawsuit against the three researchers who exposed her manipulated data, as well as against the Dean of HBS, all of whom now face paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees, even if they are exonerated.
This sad story raises a variety of issues. Presumably, ethics scholars should demonstrate a higher standard of ethical behavior. So why does research indicate virtually no difference between ethicists and anyone else?
If researchers are accused of misconduct, shouldn’t they demonstrate the integrity of their research before their colleagues rather than resort to civil litigation? In general, haven’t lawsuits and legal expenses become a weapon to coerce legitimate claimants to keep silent?
Finally, should colleges reconsider the institution of tenure, considering how difficult it is to dislodge professors who are no longer worthy of their positions?
Perhaps most important of all, we’ve begun to expect these kinds of stories and scandals. Can a society survive when we lose trust in our institutions and in one another? And what can we do to reverse the trend?
#ethics #education #research #integrity #grappling

  continue reading

114 つのエピソード

Artwork
iconシェア
 
Manage episode 376815205 series 3359707
コンテンツは Yonason Goldson によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Yonason Goldson またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

Does anything go for a good cause? Do the ends justify the means?
These are the questions that arise on this episode of Grappling with the Gray when Kimberly Davis, Diane Helbig, and Annette Taylor join the ethics panel.
Here is our topic:
For years, I’ve been an avid fan of behavioral economics professor Dan Ariely. I’ve often referenced his work on ethics and morals in my articles and discussions.
However, he is now under fire, accused of falsifying his research for a paper about how to make people more honest, on which he collaborated with Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. Professor Ariely insists that he did not manipulate the data in developing his thesis. Hartford Insurance, which provided the data, asserts that he did just that.
As the story unfolds, an investigative committee found Professor Gino guilty of misconduct. She has been placed on leave and faces the unprecedented possibility of being stripped of tenure. She has responded by launching a lawsuit against the three researchers who exposed her manipulated data, as well as against the Dean of HBS, all of whom now face paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees, even if they are exonerated.
This sad story raises a variety of issues. Presumably, ethics scholars should demonstrate a higher standard of ethical behavior. So why does research indicate virtually no difference between ethicists and anyone else?
If researchers are accused of misconduct, shouldn’t they demonstrate the integrity of their research before their colleagues rather than resort to civil litigation? In general, haven’t lawsuits and legal expenses become a weapon to coerce legitimate claimants to keep silent?
Finally, should colleges reconsider the institution of tenure, considering how difficult it is to dislodge professors who are no longer worthy of their positions?
Perhaps most important of all, we’ve begun to expect these kinds of stories and scandals. Can a society survive when we lose trust in our institutions and in one another? And what can we do to reverse the trend?
#ethics #education #research #integrity #grappling

  continue reading

114 つのエピソード

Tüm bölümler

×
 
Loading …

プレーヤーFMへようこそ!

Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。 これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。 全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。

 

クイックリファレンスガイド