Artwork

コンテンツは Dr Alison Hardy によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Dr Alison Hardy またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Player FM -ポッドキャストアプリ
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!

🔒 Rethinking the non-examined assessment (NEA): Time Well Spent in D&T?

9:50
 
シェア
 

Manage episode 440630545 series 3367160
コンテンツは Dr Alison Hardy によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Dr Alison Hardy またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

Subscriber-only episode

Send me a message.

In this thought-provoking episode of Talking D&T, I dive into the controversial topic of assessment in design and technology education, particularly focusing on the Non-Examined Assessment (NEA) at GCSE level in England. Drawing from my recent conversation with Louise and ongoing discussions in the field, I challenge the status quo and present what some might consider a radical view: that the current NEA structure may be wasting precious teaching time.

I explore the potential for shorter, more effective assessments, backed by research dating back to the late 80s and international practices. Highlighting the curriculum and assessment review led by Professor Becky Francis, I discuss the opportunity to revolutionize how we evaluate D&T capability.

Key points include:

  1. Questioning the time allocated to NEAs in our already tight timetables
  2. Examining alternative assessment methods that could better capture students' skills
  3. The importance of clearly defined curriculum objectives in exam specifications

For D&T educators, this episode offers a fresh perspective on assessment practices and curriculum design. How might reducing formal assessment time impact your teaching and students' learning? Could we achieve more meaningful evaluations with less time?

Whether you're based in England or part of our growing international audience, this conversation encourages us to rethink our approach to D&T education. How can we ensure our assessments truly reflect the aims of D&T while maximizing learning time?

Let's keep this important dialogue going! Share your thoughts with colleagues and join the conversation about shaping the future of D&T assessment.

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'
Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.
If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.
If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.
If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  continue reading

1. Rethinking the non-examined assessment (NEA): Time Well Spent in D&T? (00:00:00)

2. Rethinking Formal Assessment in Education (00:00:06)

3. Optimizing Student Assessment Strategies (00:08:27)

177 つのエピソード

Artwork
iconシェア
 
Manage episode 440630545 series 3367160
コンテンツは Dr Alison Hardy によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Dr Alison Hardy またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

Subscriber-only episode

Send me a message.

In this thought-provoking episode of Talking D&T, I dive into the controversial topic of assessment in design and technology education, particularly focusing on the Non-Examined Assessment (NEA) at GCSE level in England. Drawing from my recent conversation with Louise and ongoing discussions in the field, I challenge the status quo and present what some might consider a radical view: that the current NEA structure may be wasting precious teaching time.

I explore the potential for shorter, more effective assessments, backed by research dating back to the late 80s and international practices. Highlighting the curriculum and assessment review led by Professor Becky Francis, I discuss the opportunity to revolutionize how we evaluate D&T capability.

Key points include:

  1. Questioning the time allocated to NEAs in our already tight timetables
  2. Examining alternative assessment methods that could better capture students' skills
  3. The importance of clearly defined curriculum objectives in exam specifications

For D&T educators, this episode offers a fresh perspective on assessment practices and curriculum design. How might reducing formal assessment time impact your teaching and students' learning? Could we achieve more meaningful evaluations with less time?

Whether you're based in England or part of our growing international audience, this conversation encourages us to rethink our approach to D&T education. How can we ensure our assessments truly reflect the aims of D&T while maximizing learning time?

Let's keep this important dialogue going! Share your thoughts with colleagues and join the conversation about shaping the future of D&T assessment.

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'
Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.
If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.
If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.
If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  continue reading

1. Rethinking the non-examined assessment (NEA): Time Well Spent in D&T? (00:00:00)

2. Rethinking Formal Assessment in Education (00:00:06)

3. Optimizing Student Assessment Strategies (00:08:27)

177 つのエピソード

すべてのエピソード

×
 
Loading …

プレーヤーFMへようこそ!

Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。 これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。 全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。

 

クイックリファレンスガイド