Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
32 subscribers
Checked 1M ago
five 年前 前追加した
コンテンツは Better Informed Network によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Better Informed Network またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal。
Player FM -ポッドキャストアプリ
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!
聞く価値のあるポッドキャスト
スポンサード
T
The Vanished
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fdb1/4fdb1aef01ce6443dd629ff96053452ddeabc873" alt="The Vanished podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="The Vanished podcast artwork"
1 Lost on Route 66: The Disappearance of Diana Hayes 6:47
6:47
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った6:47data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Was she the victim of foul play, an accident, or did she choose to disappear? In this episode of The Vanished, we retrace Diana’s last known movements, strange witness accounts, and the lingering mystery that has never been solved or.. was never meant to be solved.
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753 [Arg: 10.16.2024]
Manage episode 446080572 series 2558408
コンテンツは Better Informed Network によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Better Informed Network またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal。
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform.
341 つのエピソード
Manage episode 446080572 series 2558408
コンテンツは Better Informed Network によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Better Informed Network またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal。
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform.
341 つのエピソード
すべてのエピソード
×S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44
1:30:44
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:30:44data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57
1:15:57
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:15:57data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53
1:13:53
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:13:53data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12
1:12:12
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:12:12data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32
2:05:32
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った2:05:32data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 49:01
49:01
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った49:01data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03
1:17:03
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:17:03data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:18:04
1:18:04
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:18:04data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act , a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:30:43
1:30:43
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:30:43data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act ’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025] 2:28:50
2:28:50
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った2:28:50data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act , as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024] 1:10:58
1:10:58
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:10:58data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024] 1:50:37
1:50:37
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:50:37data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:13:34
1:13:34
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:13:34data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:26:52
1:26:52
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った1:26:52data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and whether all contract rights are “property.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086ed/086edf30ed8bbf42f24a5b5ed6aa64b0387bfea4" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024] 2:21:11
2:21:11
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った2:21:11data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 , which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
プレーヤーFMへようこそ!
Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。 これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。 全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。