Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
1
NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, No. 23-970 [Arg: 11.13.2024]
1:27:13
1:27:13
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:27:13
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether plaintiffs seeking to allege scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act based on allegations about internal company documents must plead with particularity the contents of those documents; and (2) whether plaintiffs can satisfy the Act's falsity requirement by relying on an expert opinion to substitu…
…
continue reading
1
NVIDIA Corporation v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB
1:27:13
1:27:13
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:27:13
A case in which the Court will clarify the pleading standards to show knowledge or intent for Private Securities Litigation Reform Act claims that rely on internal company documents.
…
continue reading
1
NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB
1:14:54
1:14:54
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:14:54
NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder ABSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
1
Thomas Stevenson v. His Majesty the King (41269)
1:10:49
1:10:49
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:10:49
Two people robbed a restaurant with their faces completely covered. The incident was captured on security cameras. The crime remained unsolved for several years until an unsavoury third-party witness implicated the appellant as one of the robbers. The appellant was charged with robbery and disguise with intent to commit an indictable offence under …
…
continue reading
So you've won/lost the 2024 Presidential election, what comes next? Brett and Nazim take some time to vet out what the 2024 election means for the President, the Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. Sprinkle in a touch of doom, and just a hint of gloom, and you've got a winning podcast episode. Law starts from the beginning, with a healthy ta…
…
continue reading
1
How Virginia's voter roll purge could impact the election
5:12
5:12
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
5:12
Just days before the election, the Supreme Court ruled Virginia will be able to continue to purge people from the state's voter rolls. The state has argued it is part of an effort to remove noncitizens from the rolls, but voting rights advocates have found several U.S. citizens were also removed from the rolls at the same time. Amna Nawaz discussed…
…
continue reading
1
Delligatti v. U.S., No. 23-825 [Arg: 11.12.2024]
1:03:13
1:03:13
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:03:13
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading
1
Velazquez v. Garland, No. 23-929 [Arg: 11.12.2024]
1:07:14
1:07:14
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:07:14
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, when a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, a motion to reopen filed the next business day is sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(1). ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading
1
Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 23-980 [Arg: 11.6.2024]
1:43:36
1:43:36
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:43:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading
1
E.M.D. Sales v. Carrera, No. 23-217 [Arg: 11.5.2024]
42:10
42:10
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
42:10
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra, No. 23-715 [Arg: 11.5.2024]
1:10:28
1:10:28
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:10:28
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act, means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received. ★ Support this podcast on Pa…
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell v. U.S., ex rel. Todd Heath, No. 23-1127 [Arg: 11.4.2024]
1:33:56
1:33:56
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:33:56
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program are “claims” under the False Claims Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether, when a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, a motion to reopen filed the next business day is sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(1).
…
continue reading
Velazquez v. Garland, Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
Delligatti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
1
Duncan Sinclair, et al. v. Venezia Turismo, Venice Limousine S.R.L, Narduzzi E Solemar S.L.R. (40696)
1:58:46
1:58:46
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:58:46
The appellants, Duncan and Michelle Sinclair, and their son were on a European holiday and were injured in an accident in Venice, Italy. They were passengers on a water taxi that crashed into a wooden structure. The appellants were both injured. The appellants had arranged their travels through Amex Canada Inc., operating under the name Centurion T…
…
continue reading
1
Government of Saskatchewan – Minister of Environment v. Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, et al. (40740)
2:21:20
2:21:20
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:21:20
The respondents, Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, and Métis Nation – Saskatchewan Secretariate Inc. (collectively, “the Métis respondents” or “MNS”), have long claimed Aboriginal title and rights (including commercial rights) to large areas of the Province of Saskatchewan. The appellant, Government of Saskatchewan, has consistently opposed the existenc…
…
continue reading
1
Izabela Piekut v. His Majesty the King in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue (40782)
2:33:22
2:33:22
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:33:22
Between September 1987 and October 1994, the appellant, Izabela Piekut, obtained a series of student loans through a federal government program. She graduated in 1994 and obtained her teaching diploma the following year. The appellant received two further student loans in 2002 and 2003, when she earned a master’s degree. In 2008, the appellant enro…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm.
…
continue reading
Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra
1:10:28
1:10:28
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:10:28
A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “entitled… to benefits” includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence.
…
continue reading
E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. CarreraSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HS
1:00:31
1:00:31
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:00:31
Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HSSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) (CERTAIN INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC) The appellant participated in a planned robbery with intent to steal a firearm from a seventeen year old youth. He and his co-assailants attacked the victim outside his residence. They beat him and stabbed him. Their victim died from his wounds. The appellant and his co-ass…
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. cv. United States, ex rel. Heath
1:33:56
1:33:56
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:33:56
A case in which the Court will decide whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program are “claims” under the False Claims Act.
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. Heath
1:20:40
1:20:40
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:20:40
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. HeathSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
1
How the racial makeup of colleges changed after the affirmative action ruling
4:29
4:29
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
4:29
Universities are disclosing the racial makeup of the first class of students admitted after the Supreme Court overturned affirmative action. The numbers give a detailed look at the impact of the ruling. While there's variation, analyses show Black enrollment is down at several colleges. Geoff Bennett discussed more with David Leonhardt of The New Y…
…
continue reading
1
Bufkin v. McDonough, No. 23-713 [Arg: 10.16.2024]
1:12:45
1:12:45
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:12:45
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1), which directs the court to “take due account” of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of that rule. ★ Su…
…
continue reading
1
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753 [Arg: 10.16.2024]
1:37:34
1:37:34
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:37:34
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges m…
…
continue reading
1
Medical Marijuana v. Horn, No. 23-365 [Arg: 10.15.2024]
1:08:18
1:08:18
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:08:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading
1
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024]
49:20
49:20
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
49:20
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading
1
His Majesty the King v. Jennifer Pan, et al. (40839)
2:50:06
2:50:06
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:50:06
Armed men entered the home of Jennifer Pan and her parents. They shot and killed Mrs. Pan. They shot and seriously injured Mr. Pan. Jennifer Pan, Mr. Wong, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Mylvaganam and Mr. Carty were charged with first degree murder and attempted murder. They were tried before a jury. Mid-trial, proceedings against Mr. Carty were severed. The j…
…
continue reading
1
Telus Communications Inc., et al. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, et al. (40776)
2:30:07
2:30:07
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:30:07
In February 2019, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (“CRTC” or “Commission”), issued Telecom Notice of Consultation 2019-57 for the purpose of initiating a broad review of mobile wireless services and their associated regulatory framework. The Commission indicated that the review would focus on three key areas, includi…
…
continue reading
1
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency
1:37:34
1:37:34
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:37:34
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which …
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1).
…
continue reading
Bufkin v. McDonough, Sec. of VASupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
San Francisco v. EPASupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.
…
continue reading
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. HornSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
1
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, Sec. of Homeland Security
42:21
42:21
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
42:21
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, Sec. of Homeland SecuritySupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
1
Glossip v. Oklahoma, No. 22-7466 [Arg: 10.9.2024]
1:43:02
1:43:02
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:43:02
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the state’s suppression of the key prosecution witness’ admission that he was under the care of a psychiatrist and failure to correct that witness’ false testimony about that care and related diagnosis violate the due process of law under Brady v. Maryland and Napue v. Illinois; (2) whether the entirety of the suppre…
…
continue reading
1
Lackey v. Stinnie, No. 23-621 [Arg: 10.8.2024]
1:17:55
1:17:55
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:17:55
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether a party must obtain a ruling that conclusively decides the merits in its favor, as opposed to merely predicting a likelihood of later success, to prevail on the merits under 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and (2) whether a party must obtain an enduring change in the parties’ legal relationship from a judicial act, as opposed to a…
…
continue reading
1
Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23-852 [Arg: 10.8.2024]
1:16:08
1:16:08
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:16:08
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether “a weapon parts kit that is designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 is a “firearm” regulated by the Gun Control Act of 1968; and (2) whether “a partially complete, disassembled, or nonfunctional …
…
continue reading
1
Williams v. Washington, No. 23-191 [Arg: 10.7.2024]
1:15:51
1:15:51
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:15:51
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer による
…
continue reading