Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon
…
continue reading
Looking for entertaining basketball content without the drama? Check out The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Join Robaire, Chris, and Henri every Wednesday for the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Fur ...
…
continue reading
In under 30 minutes. Do you want to understand specific cases? We are here to provide commentary on every Supreme Court case.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
Send us a text March Madness delivers its trademark heartbreak as Colorado State falls on a buzzer-beater, reminding us why we love this tournament despite its brutal finality for college players whose careers end in an instant. • College basketball's changing landscape with NIL deals and the transfer portal creating unprecedented player movement •…
…
continue reading

1
Supreme Court upholds Biden regulation making ghost guns easier to trace
4:03
4:03
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
4:03The Supreme Court upheld Biden-era regulations on ghost guns. Those are firearms that can be put together at home with partially assembled kits, making them nearly impossible to trace. Sales of those guns exploded after they came onto the market and their use in gun crimes also rose significantly. Amna Nawaz discussed more with Jennifer Mascia of T…
…
continue reading
FCC v. Consumers' ResearchSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading

1
Mohawk Council of Kanesatake v. Louis-Victor Sylvestre, et al. (41131)
1:43:06
1:43:06
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:43:06The respondents are various professionals who obtained judgments against the appellant in 2004, to which a ten-year prescriptive period applies under art. 2924 of the Civil Code of Québec. Certain actions interrupted prescription between 2005 and 2007, after which prescription started running again.A bailiff served a notice of execution on the appe…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide issues relating to the 30-day deadline to seek review of a ruling by the Board of Immigration Appeals denying withholding of deportation.
…
continue reading

1
Delligatti v. United States ("Crime of Violence")
7:25
7:25
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
7:25Send us a text In Delligatti v. United States, the Supreme Court held that New York attempted second-degree murder qualifies as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) because the knowing or intentional causation of death, whether by act or omission, necessarily involves the use of physical force under §924(c)(3)(A). Salvatore Delligatti was co…
…
continue reading

1
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025]
1:35:51
1:35:51
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:35:51QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act, which authorizes a “party aggrieved” by an agency’s “final order” to petition for review in a court of appeals, allows nonparties to obtain review of claims asserting that an agency order exceeds the agency’s statutory authority; and whether the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of…
…
continue reading
Oklahoma v. EPASupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading

1
EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.
1:28:46
1:28:46
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:28:46EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.Supreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading

1
Stephen Emond and Claudette Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Company (41077)
2:08:39
2:08:39
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:08:39Stephen and Claudette Emond lived in a home on the Ottawa River that was located in the catchment area of the Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority (“MVCA”). They had purchased a standard form residential homeowners’ insurance policy from Trillium Mutual Insurance Company. The Emonds’ home was deemed a total loss as a result of flooding in Apri…
…
continue reading

1
What justices said during a critical Supreme Court hearing on redistricting and race
5:01
5:01
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
5:01The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a key redistricting case that could reshape how states draw districts by race. A group of voters identifying as "non-African American" argues Louisiana's congressional map, which created two majority-Black districts after a federal court found the previous one discriminatory, is biased toward Black voters. …
…
continue reading
Louisiana v. CallaisSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
Riley v. Bondi, Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading

1
Thompson v. United States (Criminal / False Statement)
5:52
5:52
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
5:52Send us a text In Thompson v. United States the Supreme Court held that 18 U.S.C. §1014, which prohibits “knowingly mak[ing] any false statement” to influence the FDIC’s actions on a loan, does not extend to statements that are merely misleading but not technically false. Patrick Thompson, a former Chicago Alderman, was charged under §1014 after di…
…
continue reading
Send us a text The Lakers snap their four-game losing streak with a win against the Suns while maintaining their position in a tightly contested Western Conference. • Lakers finding team identity even with LeBron James out of the lineup • Jackson Hayes emerging as an effective big man in the pick-and-roll with Luka Dončić • Kevin Durant and the Pho…
…
continue reading

1
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, No. 23-1141 [Arg: 3.4.2025]
1:31:10
1:31:10
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:31:10QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States is the proximate cause of alleged injuries to the Mexican government stemming from violence committed by drug cartels in Mexico; and whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States amounts to “aiding and abetting” illegal firearms trafficking becau…
…
continue reading

1
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, No. 23-1259 [Arg: 3.3.2025]
52:42
52:42
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
52:42QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended co ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network による
…
continue reading

1
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., No. 23-1201 [Arg: 3.3.2025]
49:24
49:24
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
49:24QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether plaintiffs must prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network による
…
continue reading

1
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 [Arg: 2.26.2025]
54:56
54:56
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
54:56QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, in addition to pleading the other elements of an employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a majority-group plaintiff must show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.” ★ Support this pod…
…
continue reading

1
Perttu v. Richards, No. 23-1324 [Arg: 2.25.2025]
1:16:17
1:16:17
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:16:17QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, in cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading

1
Esteras v. U.S., No. 23-7483 [Arg: 2.25.2025]
1:15:30
1:15:30
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:15:30QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, even though Congress excluded 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) from 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)’s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, a district court may rely on the Section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading

1
Gutierrez v. Saenz, No. 23-7809 [Arg: 2.24.2025]
1:34:31
1:34:31
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:34:31QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Article III standing requires a particularized determination of whether a specific state official will redress the plaintiff’s injury by following a favorable declaratory judgment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network による
…
continue reading

1
San Francisco v. EPA (Admin Law / Clean Water Act)
9:57
9:57
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
9:57Send us a text In City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court addressed the scope of the EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case arose when the EPA issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to San Francisco's wastewater treatment facilities, including provis…
…
continue reading

1
Dewberry Group Inc v. Dewberry Engineers Inc (Trademark)
6:26
6:26
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
6:26Send us a text In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc., the Supreme Court addressed the scope of monetary remedies under the Lanham Act. The case arose from a trademark dispute between two entities using the "Dewberry" name. The district court awarded the plaintiff not only the defendant's profits but also those of affiliated companies. …
…
continue reading
Send us a text Are you noticing the shifts in NBA dynamics this season? Join us as we explore how Luka Doncic's arrival has revitalized the Los Angeles Lakers, taking fans on an emotional journey through this thrilling NBA season. This episode dives into the intricate narratives of community engagement, recent trades, and rising tensions in the sta…
…
continue reading

1
Supreme Court rejects Trump administration’s bid to freeze billions in foreign aid
4:42
4:42
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
4:42The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration’s request to freeze billions of dollars in foreign aid for work that has already been done. The administration asked the court to block a lower-court ruling ordering the government to release the funds. It remains unclear when the aid will now be distributed. John Yang has the update.…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a nonparty can challenge a federal agency’s “final order” under the Hobbs Act’s judicial review provision; and whether federal nuclear laws allow the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to license private companies to store spent nuclear fuel at off-reactor sites.…
…
continue reading
NRC v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading

1
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
1:31:09
1:31:09
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:31:09A case in which the Court will decide whether U.S. gun manufacturers can be held liable for violence in Mexico under theories of proximate causation and aiding and abetting, based on their domestic production and sale of firearms that are later trafficked to Mexican cartels.
…
continue reading

1
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
1:18:17
1:18:17
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:18:17Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos MexicanosSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading

1
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.
49:24
49:24
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
49:24A case in which the Court will decide whether plaintiffs must prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
…
continue reading

1
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (Arbitration / Civil Procedure)
5:41
5:41
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
5:41Send us a text In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., the Supreme Court held that a case voluntarily dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) qualifies as a "final proceeding" under Rule 60(b), allowing a district court to reopen the case. Gary Waetzig sued Halliburton for age discrimination but later dismis…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint.
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Glossip v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant is entitled to a new trial when the prosecution knowingly fails to correct false testimony and that error could have contributed to the verdict. Richard Glossip was convicted and sentenced to death based primarily on the testimony of Justin Sneed, who claimed Gl…
…
continue reading
BLOM Bank SAL v. HonickmanSupreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
CC/Devas Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States による
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs who secure only preliminary injunctive relief before their case becomes moot do not qualify as "prevailing parties" entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b). Virginia drivers challenged the constitutionality of a law suspending licenses for unpaid court fines. A…
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Williams v. Reed, the Supreme Court rejects Alabama’s administrative-exhaustion rule, holding that states cannot require claimants to complete an allegedly delayed administrative process before filing a 42 U.S.C. §1983 lawsuit challenging that very delay. Writing for the Court, Justice Kavanaugh explains that the Alabama Supreme C…
…
continue reading

1
Wisconsin Bell v. US ex rel Heath (False Claims Act)
7:02
7:02
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
7:02Send us a text In Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath, the Supreme Court unanimously affirms that E-Rate reimbursement requests qualify as “claims” under the False Claims Act (FCA). The case centers on whether federal subsidies distributed through the E-Rate program—funded by contributions from telecommunications carriers and admini…
…
continue reading
Send us a text This week's episode explores the complexities of Las Vegas, which is now attempting to reinvent itself as a family-friendly destination. Join us as we share personal stories from our latest trips and discuss the Lakers' recent dominant performance against the Denver Nuggets. Exploring the deeper charm of Las Vegas and its history Sha…
…
continue reading

1
Frédéric Rioux v. His Majesty the King (41362)
1:15:33
1:15:33
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:15:33Judge Gagnon of the Court of Québec acquitted the appellant, Frédéric Rioux, of the offence of sexual assault committed between August 1 and 2, 2019, in Bonsecours. Although the Crown had laid only one charge for a sexual assault that occurred in Bonsecours, the Crown’s evidence related to two instances of sexual intercourse, one in Magog and the o…
…
continue reading

1
Roger Patrick Bilodeau v. His Majesty the King (41320)
1:13:52
1:13:52
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:13:52The appellant, Roger Patrick Bilodeau, was found guilty by a jury of two counts of manslaughter for the shooting deaths of two men. He was found liable as a party under s. 21(2) of the Criminal Code, for having formed an intention to carry out an unlawful purpose common with his son, who shot the deceased. He appealed his convictions, arguing that …
…
continue reading

1
Maxime Chicoine-Joubert v. His Majesty the King (41262)
48:59
48:59
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
48:59After a jury trial before Blanchard J. of the Superior Court, the appellant, Maxime Chicoine-Joubert, was convicted of one count of second degree murder and one count of assault with a weapon. On appeal, Mr. Chicoine-Joubert argued that the judge had erred in his instructions regarding manslaughter and in his answer to questions from the jury by fa…
…
continue reading

1
His Majesty the King v. Lucas Hanrahan (41220)
1:10:42
1:10:42
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:10:42The respondent was found not guilty of sexual assault following a jury trial. Consent was the central issue. The Crown appealed the respondent’s acquittal, submitting that the trial judge erred in law by restricting Crown counsel’s examination of the complainant on her prior statements (text messages that were exchanged between the complainant and …
…
continue reading

1
His Majesty the King v. Wayne Lester Singer (41090)
2:48:41
2:48:41
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:48:41On March 20, 2019, at approximately 11:00 p.m., police officers received a tip that Mr. Singer was driving a truck and the caller believed that he was intoxicated. More than an hour later, an officer observed a vehicle matching the vehicle description given by the caller. The truck was parked on a residential driveway. Its lights were on and its ig…
…
continue reading

1
Kuldeep Kaur Ahluwalia v. Amrit Pal Singh Ahluwalia (Day 2/2) (41061)
1:56:05
1:56:05
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:56:05The parties were married in 1999 in India. During their sixteen years of marriage, they had two children. The trial judge found that Mr. Ahluwalia was abusive during the marriage. The trial judge accepted Ms. Ahluwalia’s evidence that the parties’ relationship was characterized by a pattern of emotional and physical abuse and financial control. Ms.…
…
continue reading

1
Kuldeep Kaur Ahluwalia v. Amrit Pal Singh Ahluwalia (Day 1/2) (41061)
2:06:04
2:06:04
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:06:04The parties were married in 1999 in India. During their sixteen years of marriage, they had two children. The trial judge found that Mr. Ahluwalia was abusive during the marriage. The trial judge accepted Ms. Ahluwalia’s evidence that the parties’ relationship was characterized by a pattern of emotional and physical abuse and financial control. Ms.…
…
continue reading