))
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July. SIDEBAR Episodes will take place between the end of the current term and the start of the next term. (July - October)
Decisions of the Supreme Court, summarized by the court itself.Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi, With no personal commentary, you can make up your own mind about the decisions. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly---Paypal:https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus---Cash App: $RJDieken---Venmo: RJ-Dieken
T
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
1
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
Free Law Project
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
T
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
1
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
Robaire Taylor, Chris Young, Henri Taylor
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
The Term is a podcast from Law360 for the busy U.S. Supreme Court watcher. Give us about 15 minutes each week and we'll catch you up on all the big action at the nation's highest court, along with a list of what to watch in the coming sessions. Hosts senior Supreme Court reporter Jimmy Hoover in Washington, D.C. and editor-at-large Natalie Rodriguez in New York City cut through a busy docket to focus on the key cases and developments everyone will be talking about.
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
T
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
1
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
Hemant Mehta
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
T
The ComMN Law: A Minnesota Supreme Court Podcast
1
The ComMN Law: A Minnesota Supreme Court Podcast
TCL Media
We review legal news, summarize interesting cases, and highlight one Minnesota Supreme Court case per episode.
L
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
1
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
AARON LARSON
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals.
A
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision - Audio
1
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision - Audio
Get A Life Media, Billy Crone
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
A
Advice & Consent: The Supreme Court Nomination Podcast
1
Advice & Consent: The Supreme Court Nomination Podcast
Advice & Consent: The Supreme Court Nomination Podcast
News, views, and insight on the future of the Supreme Court. The ragtag gang of the usual suspects returns to chat about Justice Kennedy's retirement, and the nomination process to follow. This is the second season of the show following the Garland/Gorsuch* nominations. Following in the footsteps of our prior podcasts, Advice & Consent is insightful, not stodgy… opinionated, but not dogmatic. This is a serious process, but we find some entertainment along the way too. Advice & Consent is an ...
Support the show (https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus)RJ Dieken による
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Concepcion v. United States, No. 20-1650 [Arg: 1.19.2022]
1:15:29
1:15:29
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:15:29
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, when deciding if it should “impose a reduced sentence” on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments. Date Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) May 24 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response …
The Supreme Court this week agreed to hear the case of a high school football coach who prayed with students, weighed whether Boston could refuse to fly a Christian-themed flag, and debated Ted Cruz's challenge to campaign finance law. On this week’s episode of The Term, we’re breaking down a big week in First Amendment law.…
It's been a long time, we shouldn't have left you... The Supreme Court Podcast returns for the first show of 2022 with a full docket of topics, starting with the NBA's handling of the latest phase of the Coronavirus pandemic, Lebron's MVP campaign, and other current news from around the league.Robaire Taylor, Chris Young, Henri Taylor による
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate
1:28:22
1:28:22
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:28:22
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether appellees have standing to challenge the statutory loan-repayment limit of 52 U.S.C. 30116(j); and (2) whether the loan-repayment limit violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
Concepcion v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States による
We have one more emergency episode, which covers the Supreme Court's decisions in NFIB v. DOL and Biden v. Missouri, which discusses why one mandate is OK and the other mandate is not OK. Once again, there's probably more administrative law than you're expecting. Law starts from the beginning.
S
Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS)
1
Hemphill v New York (6a Confrontation -- Rules of evidence)
9:23
9:23
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
9:23
The trial court violated the Petitioner’s 6th Amendment right to confront witnesses against him. Support the show (https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus)RJ Dieken による
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate, No. 20-12 [Arg: 1.19.2022]
1:28:22
1:28:22
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:28:22
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether appellees have standing to challenge the statutory loan-repayment limit of 52 U.S.C. 30116(j); and whether the loan-repayment limit violates the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment. Date Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) Jul 02 2021 | Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due August 6, 2021) Aug …
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 20-1566 [Arg: 1.18.2022]
1:04:12
1:04:12
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:04:12
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal court hearing state law claims brought under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules to determine what substantive law governs the claims at issue, or whether it may apply federal common law. Date Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) May 06 2021 | Petition f…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Shurtleff v. Boston, No. 20-1800 [Arg: 1.18.2022]
1:22:57
1:22:57
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:22:57
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit’s failure to apply the Supreme Court’s forum doctrine to the First Amendment challenge of a private religious organization that was denied access to briefly display its flag on a city flagpole, pursuant to a city policy expressly designating the flagpole a public forum open t…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 20-1472 [Arg: 1.12.2022]
1:07:11
1:07:11
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:07:11
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the Tax Court of a notice of determination from the commissioner of internal revenue in 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d)(1) is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule subject to equitable tolling. Date Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) Apr 16 2021 | Pet…
A case in which the Court will decide whether a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments when deciding whether to “impose a reduced sentence” on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018.
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate
1:15:53
1:15:53
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:15:53
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for SenateSupreme Court of the United States による
A case in which the Court will decide whether a city’s refusal to fly a private religious organization’s flag, which depicts a cross, on a city flagpole violates the organization’s First Amendment rights.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
1:04:13
1:04:13
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:04:13
A case in which the Court will decide what law a federal court should apply to state law claims brought under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza CollectionSupreme Court of the United States による
Shurtleff v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States による
S
Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS)
1
Babcock v Kijakazi (Dual status technician retirement)
7:24
7:24
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
7:24
For purposes here Only Babcock’s National Guard service payments are payments for service “as a member of a uniformed service” not his technicians pay. Support the show (https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus)RJ Dieken による
S
Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS)
1
Biden v Missouri (HHS Medicare/Medicaid Vaccine Mandate)
21:05
21:05
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
21:05
The Court stays a stay of a vaccine mandate for Medicare and Medicaid facility employees. Support the show (https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus)RJ Dieken による
Granting a stay of OSHA’s vaccine mandate. Support the show (https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus)RJ Dieken による
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Garland v. Gonzalez, No. 20-322 [Arg: 1.11.2022]
1:03:36
1:03:36
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:03:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government must prove to an immigration judge that the alien is a flight risk or a danger to the community; and (2) whether, under 8 U. S. C. § 1252(f)(1), the courts below had jurisdiction…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez, No. 19-896 [Arg: 1.11.2022]
1:04:33
1:04:33
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:04:33
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government must prove to an immigration judge by clear and convincing evidence that the alien is a flight risk or a danger to the community. Date Proceedings and Orders Nov 08 2019 | Applic…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Gallardo v. Marstiller, No. 20-1263 [Arg: 1.10.2022]
1:45:25
1:45:25
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:45:25
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the federal Medicaid Act provides for a state Medicaid program to recover reimbursement for Medicaid’s payment of a beneficiary’s past medical expenses by taking funds from the portion of the beneficiary’s tort recovery that compensates for future medical expenses. Date Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) Mar 09…
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1:07:12
1:07:12
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:07:12
A case in which the Court will decide whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the Tax Court of a notice of determination from the commissioner of internal revenue in 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d)(1) is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule subject to equitable tolling.
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
57:42
57:42
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
57:42
Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States による
One of two cases on the docket for this term in which the Court will decide whether noncitizens who have spent more than six months in immigration detention awaiting resolution of their deportation withholding claim are entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge to determine whether they can be released on bond.…
One of two cases on the docket for this term in which the Court will decide whether noncitizens who have spent more than six months in immigration detention awaiting resolution of their deportation withholding claim are entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge to determine whether they can be released on bond.…
Johnson v. Arteaga-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States による
Garland, Att'y Gen. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States による
A case in which the Court will decide whether the federal Medicaid Act provides for a state Medicaid program to recover reimbursement for Medicaid’s payment of a beneficiary’s past medical expenses by taking funds from the portion of the beneficiary’s tort recovery that compensates for future medical expenses.…
Gallardo v. MarstillerSupreme Court of the United States による
Sound the alarm, as we are back with an emergency podcast discussing the oral argument in National Federation of Independent Businesses (i.e. the Dudes) v. Department of Labor, and Biden v. Missouri, two cases discussing the Constitutionality of President Biden's Vaccine Mandate, BUT only through the context of Administrative Law. The law starts fr…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, No. 21A244 [Arg: 1.07.2022]
2:08:05
2:08:05
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:08:05
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Supreme Court should issue a stay of OSHA's vaccine-or-testing regime for all businesses with 100 or more employees. Date Proceedings and Orders Dec 17 2021 | Application (21A244) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh. Dec 20 2021 | Response to application (21A244) requested by Justice Kavanaugh, due by 4 p.m., …
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Biden v. Missouri, No. 21A240 [Arg: 1.7.2022]
1:26:04
1:26:04
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:26:04
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Supreme Court should issue a stay of the injunction issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri blocking a federal rule that requires all health care workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they are eli…
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S3, E12: Justices Scrutinize Biden Admin's Vaccine Rules
24:55
24:55
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
24:55
The Supreme Court heard two emergency appeals Friday on whether to allow the Biden administration to impose vaccination or testing requirements on huge swaths of the American workforce. On this week’s episode of The Term, senior employment reporter Vin Gurrieri joins us to discuss the more than 3 hours of oral arguments, how the justices seemed to …
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
2:08:06
2:08:06
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:08:06
Biden v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States による
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Nat. Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Dept. of Labor
1:50:00
1:50:00
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:50:00
Nat. Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Dept. of LaborSupreme Court of the United States による
This week's episode covers two recent opinions by Judge Neil Gorsuch, including Whole Women's Health v. Jackson (which determined whether injunctive lawsuits by abortion clinics to stop the Texas Heartbeat Law could proceed) and Dr. A v. Hochul (which asked whether President Biden's mandate could be enjoined pending a resolution on religious except…
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S3, E11: How’s It Going At The Supreme Court So Far?
24:04
24:04
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
24:04
With the year drawing to a close and the justices on break for the holiday, we’re taking the opportunity to look at how the first three months of the Supreme Court term have gone so far. On this week’s episode we welcome guest host and Law360 Pulse reporter Jack Karp, who has been tracking Supreme Court data throughout the term and will give a brea…
This week's episode (which is far less attractive than our November 21st episode) covers Thompson v. Clark, a case which asks how not-guilty a person must be to file a 1983 claim against a police officer accused of violating a person's Constitutional Rights. Although complicated and unsexy, its a case which is interesting in the context of police-o…
Petitioners may pursue a pre enforcement challenge against certain of the named defendants, but not others (rejecting some on standing, and some on sovereign immunity). Support the show (https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus)RJ Dieken による
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S3, E10: A First Amendment Fight Over Maine’s School Subsidies
25:40
25:40
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
25:40
Discrimination or church-state separation? That was the question the Supreme Court justices debated this week in a blockbuster First Amendment case over a Maine private school subsidy program that excludes "sectarian" schools. Law360's The Term dives into the arguments on this week's episode.Law360 - Legal News & Analysis による
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Shinn v. Ramirez, No. 20-1009 [Arg: 12.8.2021]
54:04
54:04
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
54:04
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether application of the equitable rule the Supreme Court announced in Martinez v. Ryan renders the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which precludes a federal court from considering evidence outside the state-court record when reviewing the merits of a claim for habeas relief if a prisoner or his attorney has fai…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Carson v. Makin, No. 20-1088 [Arg: 12.8.2021]
1:55:01
1:55:01
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:55:01
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a state violates the religion clauses or equal protection clause of the United States Constitution by prohibiting students participating in an otherwise generally available student-aid program from choosing to use their aid to attend schools that provide religious, or “sectarian,” instruction. Date Proceedings and Orders…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
U.S. v. Taylor, No. 20-1459 [Arg: 12.7.2021]
1:26:26
1:26:26
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:26:26
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)’s definition of “crime of violence” excludes attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). Date Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) Apr 14 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2021) Apr 30 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a res…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Hughes v. Northwestern University, No. 19-1401 [Arg: 12.6.2021]
1:30:48
1:30:48
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:30:48
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether allegations that a defined-contribution retirement plan paid or charged its participants fees that substantially exceeded fees for alternative available investment products or services are sufficient to state a claim against plan fiduciaries for breach of the duty of prudence under the Employee Retirement Income Security…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Patel v. Garland, No. 20-979 [Arg: 12.6.2021]
1:31:18
1:31:18
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:31:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) preserves the jurisdiction of federal courts to review a nondiscretionary determination that a noncitizen is ineligible for certain types of discretionary relief. Date Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) Jan 15 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2…
