Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024]

Supreme Court of the United States

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

32 subscribers

five 年前前追加した

コンテンツは Better Informed Network によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャストコンテンツは、Better Informed Network またはそのポッドキャストプラットフォームパートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal。

The Agile Brand with Greg Kihlström®

1
#644: AI-augmented human recommendations for retail customers with Noah Zamansky, Stitch Fix 27:12

約 3 日前27:12

「あとで再生する」

リスト

気に入り

気に入った

27:12

We are here at eTail Palm Springs and seeing and hearing the latest and greatest in e-commerce and retail. Question: Do you need to choose between AI and human recommendations as a customer? Why not have both? After all, don’t each have their strengths? AI in the retail experience is all the rage these days, but today I’m talking with someone from a brand that has been incorporating AI-personalized experiences and shopping combined with expert human recommendations for over 14 years, and continues to innovate today. Today we’re going to talk about how AI-based personalization plus human creativity and input makes an amazing customer experience at Stitch Fix. To help me discuss this topic, I’d like to welcome Noah Zamansky, Vice President of Product and Client Experience at Stitch Fix. About Noah Zamansky Noah Zamansky serves as the Vice President of Product and Client Experience at Stitch Fix, where he leads cross-functional teams spanning Product, Design, Engineering, Algorithms, and Platform Development. A seasoned leader, Noah has a proven track record of shaping product vision and strategy, designing exceptional user experiences, and spearheading the launch of new business ventures. Before joining Stitch Fix, Noah held the role of Senior Director of Product Management at eBay, overseeing Fashion and Vertical Experiences. Resources Stitch Fix: https://www.stitchfix.com eTail Palm Springs: https://etailwest.wbresearch.com/ Connect with Greg on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregkihlstrom Listen to The Agile Brand without the ads. Learn more here: https://bit.ly/3ymf7hd Don't miss a thing: get the latest episodes, sign up for our newsletter and more: https://www.theagilebrand.show Check out The Agile Brand Guide website with articles, insights, and Martechipedia, the wiki for marketing technology: https://www.agilebrandguide.com The Agile Brand podcast is brought to you by TEKsystems. Learn more here: https://www.teksystems.com/versionnextnow The Agile Brand is produced by Missing Link—a Latina-owned strategy-driven, creatively fueled production co-op. From ideation to creation, they craft human connections through intelligent, engaging and informative content. https://www.missinglink.company…

約 1 年前 49:20

MP3•エピソードのホーム

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

341 つのエピソード

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024]

Supreme Court of the United States

32 subscribers

published 約 1 年前

MP3•エピソードのホーム

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

341 つのエピソード

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

すべてのエピソード

1
Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44

5 weeks前1:30:44

1:30:44

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1
Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57

5 weeks前1:15:57

1:15:57

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53

5 weeks前1:13:53

1:13:53

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12

5 weeks前1:12:12

1:12:12

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32

5 weeks前2:05:32

2:05:32

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 49:01

7 weeks前49:01

49:01

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03

7 weeks前1:17:03

1:17:03

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:18:04

7 weeks前1:18:04

1:18:04

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act , a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1
Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:30:43

7 weeks前1:30:43

1:30:43

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act ’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1
TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025] 2:28:50

7 weeks前2:28:50

2:28:50

QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act , as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024] 1:10:58

11 weeks前1:10:58

1:10:58

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024] 1:50:37

11 weeks前1:50:37

1:50:37

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:13:34

11 weeks前1:13:34

1:13:34

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1
Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:26:52

11 weeks前1:26:52

1:26:52

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and whether all contract rights are “property.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1
U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024] 2:21:11

12 weeks前2:21:11

2:21:11

QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 , which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

プレーヤーFMへようこそ！

Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。

500+以上のトピックを聴こう

32 subscribers

Supreme Court of the United Statesに似ているもの

$25 PlayStation Store Gift Card [Digital Code]

Amazon Basics Multipurpose Copy Printer Paper, 8.5 x 11 inches, 20 lb, 1 Ream, 500 Sheets, 92 Bright, White

Mighty Patch™ Original patch from Hero Cosmetics - Hydrocolloid Acne Pimple Patch for Covering Zits and Blemishes in Face and Skin, Vegan-friendly and Not Tested on Animals (36 Count)

聞く価値のあるポッドキャスト

Supreme Court of the United States « » Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024]

Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024]

聞く価値のあるポッドキャスト

プレーヤーFMへようこそ！

Mini Mic Pro (Newest Model), Wireless Microphone for iPhone, iPad, Android, Lavalier Microphone for Video Recording - 2 Pack iPhone Mic Crystal Clear Recording with USB-C for Podcast Microphone, ASMR

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

TurboTax Deluxe 2024 Tax Software, Federal & State Tax Return [PC/MAC Download]

Tubi: Watch Free Movies & TV Shows

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Supreme Court of the United Statesに似ているもの

クイックリファレンスガイド

Supreme Court of the United States « »
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024]