Artwork

コンテンツは The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Player FM -ポッドキャストアプリ
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott Breaks Down Why There Was A Hung Jury In Karen Read's Trial

9:52
 
シェア
 

Manage episode 427891758 series 3569233
コンテンツは The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott discusses the mistrial in the Karen Read case, expressing surprise that it didn't end in an outright acquittal. She explores the psychology of jury deliberations, noting that deeply entrenched opinions likely prevented a unanimous verdict. The conversation highlights the problematic behavior of Trooper Proctor, whose unprofessional and derogatory comments about Read undermined the prosecution. Scott emphasizes that the conflicting expert testimonies and the weak presentation by the prosecution made it difficult for the jury to reach a conclusive decision. Both Scott and Brueski suggest that retrying the case may not yield a different outcome due to the persistent issues with key witnesses and the lack of compelling evidence.
### Main Points:
- The Karen Read trial ended in a mistrial due to a divided jury.
- Jurors likely entered deliberations with entrenched opinions, making consensus difficult.
- Trooper Proctor's unprofessional behavior and derogatory comments negatively impacted the prosecution's case.
- Conflicting expert testimonies added to the jury's confusion and indecision.
- The prosecution's weak presentation failed to provide a clear narrative.
- The lack of conclusive evidence makes a conviction in a retrial unlikely.
- Scott and Brueski question the value of retrying the case given the recurring issues with key witnesses.
### Relevant Hashtags:
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ShavaunScott #TrooperProctor #Mistrial #LegalStrategy #PsychologyOfJury
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

410 つのエピソード

Artwork
iconシェア
 
Manage episode 427891758 series 3569233
コンテンツは The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott discusses the mistrial in the Karen Read case, expressing surprise that it didn't end in an outright acquittal. She explores the psychology of jury deliberations, noting that deeply entrenched opinions likely prevented a unanimous verdict. The conversation highlights the problematic behavior of Trooper Proctor, whose unprofessional and derogatory comments about Read undermined the prosecution. Scott emphasizes that the conflicting expert testimonies and the weak presentation by the prosecution made it difficult for the jury to reach a conclusive decision. Both Scott and Brueski suggest that retrying the case may not yield a different outcome due to the persistent issues with key witnesses and the lack of compelling evidence.
### Main Points:
- The Karen Read trial ended in a mistrial due to a divided jury.
- Jurors likely entered deliberations with entrenched opinions, making consensus difficult.
- Trooper Proctor's unprofessional behavior and derogatory comments negatively impacted the prosecution's case.
- Conflicting expert testimonies added to the jury's confusion and indecision.
- The prosecution's weak presentation failed to provide a clear narrative.
- The lack of conclusive evidence makes a conviction in a retrial unlikely.
- Scott and Brueski question the value of retrying the case given the recurring issues with key witnesses.
### Relevant Hashtags:
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ShavaunScott #TrooperProctor #Mistrial #LegalStrategy #PsychologyOfJury
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

410 つのエピソード

すべてのエピソード

×
 
Loading …

プレーヤーFMへようこそ!

Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。 これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。 全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。

 

クイックリファレンスガイド