The Downfall Of Diddy: Diddy's Opposition To Diageo's Motion To Compel Arbitration (Part 3) (10/13/24)

The Epstein Chronicles

In the lawsuit between Diageo and Combs Wines, Sean "Diddy" Combs’ legal team submitted an opposition to Diageo’s motion to compel arbitration or dismiss the complaint. In this opposition, Combs argues that his claims, including requests for equitable relief, are not subject to arbitration under the terms of the joint venture agreement. The agreement's language, which allows for injunctive relief in cases of "irreparable harm," forms the basis of Combs' assertion that these matters should be handled in court.
Combs alleges that Diageo discriminated against his brand by limiting its distribution and failing to meet its obligations within their partnership, claims that, according to his team, merit judicial review rather than arbitration. The court agreed with Combs in an earlier ruling, allowing these equitable claims to proceed in court. Diageo, however, maintains that all disputes, including those for damages, should be resolved through arbitration and is appealing the court’s decision to deny its motion. The case continues to unfold as both sides contest the interpretation of the arbitration provisions and the scope of equitable relief allowed under the agreement.
(commercial at 10:35)
to contact me:
[e-mail]
source:
Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_v_Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_MEMORANDUM_OF_LAW_I_69.pdf (digitalmusicnews.com)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.