#13 - What makes a contractor a contractor?

Employment Law for the Time Poor

コンテンツは Piper Alderman Employment Relations and Piper Alderman によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャストコンテンツは、Piper Alderman Employment Relations and Piper Alderman またはそのポッドキャストプラットフォームパートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal。

3+ y ago 34:12

MP3•エピソードのホーム

In Episode 13 of our Employment Law for the Time Poor podcast, Professor Andrew Stewart and Emily Haar consider consider four recent cases on the vexed issue of whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee.

As the cases reveal, there are two competing views as to how the multi-factor test is to be applied: does the Court need to look at the substance and reality of the relationship, or do the contractual arrangements reveal the parties’ true intentions about the relationship? To what degree does the “contractor” have to be running a business of their own to legally be an independent contractor?

Professor Andrew Stewart and Emily Haar consider the viability of the “Odco” system of treating labour hire workers as contractors and whether the High Court will be tasked to determine which of the two competing views is the correct method of applying the multi-factor test.

This is an area that is rife with risk for organisations, and knowing the current state of the law is a must-do.

We discuss the following four cases in this podcast episode:

Dental Corp Pty Ltd v Moffet [2020] FCAFC 118 (16 June)
Jamsek v ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 119 (16 July)
Eastern Van Services Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2020] VSCA 154 (12 June)
CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 122 (17 July)

37 つのエピソード

#Business #Employment #Piper Aldermans Employment Relations #Piper Aldermans