Artwork

コンテンツは Viktoria Altman によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Viktoria Altman またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Player FM -ポッドキャストアプリ
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!

Quashing A Subpoena In An Illinois Divorce - Russell D. Knight

2:47
 
シェア
 

Manage episode 455165545 series 3376163
コンテンツは Viktoria Altman によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Viktoria Altman またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

From Law Office Of Russell D. Knight - This podcast delves into the article Quashing A Subpoena In An Illinois Divorce, exploring the key legal processes involved in challenging subpoenas during a divorce in Chicago, Illinois. Subpoenas play a significant role in the discovery process, allowing parties to request relevant documents and evidence from third parties. However, there are instances where these requests may be contested through motions to quash, particularly when the requests are overly burdensome, irrelevant, or seek privileged information.
Listeners will learn about Illinois Supreme Court Rules, including Rule 201(b)(1), which outlines the scope of discovery, and Rule 204(a)(1), which governs attorney-issued subpoenas. The discussion highlights the grounds for quashing a subpoena, such as privilege under statutes like 735 ILCS 5/8-802 for doctor-patient communications or 740 ILCS 110/10 for therapist-client interactions. The podcast also addresses balancing discovery relevance against privacy, drawing on case law such as Kunkel v. Walton and Mistler v. Mancini.
We also discuss the practical aspects of filing and responding to motions to quash in Illinois divorces. Whether addressing harassment claims or challenging unnecessary discovery requests, Illinois courts consider factors like the burdens on third parties and the reasonable relevance of the information requested. Cases like Shapo v. Tires ‘N Tracks, Inc. and People v. Paris provide insight into the standards courts use when reviewing these motions.
The podcast provides a detailed look at the legal framework for subpoenas in Illinois divorce cases and underscores the importance of understanding these processes for both litigants and attorneys. By exploring Quashing A Subpoena In An Illinois Divorce, listeners gain valuable insights into how discovery tools and objections shape the resolution of family law disputes in Chicago and beyond.
Law Office of Russell D. Knight
1165 N Clark St #700, Chicago, IL 60610, United States
(773) 334-6311
https://www.google.com/maps?cid=13056420905624162796

  continue reading

1375 つのエピソード

Artwork
iconシェア
 
Manage episode 455165545 series 3376163
コンテンツは Viktoria Altman によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Viktoria Altman またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作物をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

From Law Office Of Russell D. Knight - This podcast delves into the article Quashing A Subpoena In An Illinois Divorce, exploring the key legal processes involved in challenging subpoenas during a divorce in Chicago, Illinois. Subpoenas play a significant role in the discovery process, allowing parties to request relevant documents and evidence from third parties. However, there are instances where these requests may be contested through motions to quash, particularly when the requests are overly burdensome, irrelevant, or seek privileged information.
Listeners will learn about Illinois Supreme Court Rules, including Rule 201(b)(1), which outlines the scope of discovery, and Rule 204(a)(1), which governs attorney-issued subpoenas. The discussion highlights the grounds for quashing a subpoena, such as privilege under statutes like 735 ILCS 5/8-802 for doctor-patient communications or 740 ILCS 110/10 for therapist-client interactions. The podcast also addresses balancing discovery relevance against privacy, drawing on case law such as Kunkel v. Walton and Mistler v. Mancini.
We also discuss the practical aspects of filing and responding to motions to quash in Illinois divorces. Whether addressing harassment claims or challenging unnecessary discovery requests, Illinois courts consider factors like the burdens on third parties and the reasonable relevance of the information requested. Cases like Shapo v. Tires ‘N Tracks, Inc. and People v. Paris provide insight into the standards courts use when reviewing these motions.
The podcast provides a detailed look at the legal framework for subpoenas in Illinois divorce cases and underscores the importance of understanding these processes for both litigants and attorneys. By exploring Quashing A Subpoena In An Illinois Divorce, listeners gain valuable insights into how discovery tools and objections shape the resolution of family law disputes in Chicago and beyond.
Law Office of Russell D. Knight
1165 N Clark St #700, Chicago, IL 60610, United States
(773) 334-6311
https://www.google.com/maps?cid=13056420905624162796

  continue reading

1375 つのエピソード

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

プレーヤーFMへようこそ!

Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。 これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。 全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。

 

クイックリファレンスガイド