))
SCOTUStalk is a nonpartisan podcast about the Supreme Court for lawyers and non-lawyers alike, brought to you by SCOTUSblog. SCOTUStalk is hosted by Amy Howe and produced by Katie Barlow, Ellena Erskine, Angie Gou, and James Romoser. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
A Heritage Foundation podcast breaking down what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and more. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View ou ...
Audio of Supreme Court opinions. Finally. Listen to quality audio of the opinions of the Court from the most current cases; relevant case law and controlling precedents; dozens of past landmark decisions; overturned, controversial, fascinating, and endangered decisions; and miscellaneous (but relevant) orders. A rare find for SCOTUS geeks.
A podcast from SCOTUSblog.com
Podcast by James
A quick, three-day weblog as a podcast host for the United States Supreme Court's oral arguments regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.
Decisions of the Supreme Court, summarized by the court itself.Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi, With no personal commentary, you can make up your own mind about the decisions. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly---Paypal:https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus---Cash App: $RJDieken---Venmo: RJ-Dieken
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Dissent Part 1: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021) Dissenting Opinion (Arizona; Voting Rights Act, Section 2)
50:23
50:23
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
50:23
Part 1 of 2: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021) Dissenting Opinion (Arizona; Voting Rights Act, Section 2)Pippah Getchell による
This week the Court heard arguments in two major cases involving challenges to executive-branch agencies, and another race case involving a federal statute that restricts adoption and foster placement for Native American Children. Your hosts discuss those arguments, and then Zack interviews former ambassador and double SCOTUS clerk Chris Landau. Af…
S
SCOTUStalk
1
SCOTUS Spotlight: Michael Dreeben on helping the justices have a conversation
26:05
26:05
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
26:05
Michael Dreeben, who has argued 107 cases at the Supreme Court, joins us for another episode in our SCOTUS Spotlight series. Dreeben looks back on notable moments from his career as an advocate, including his very first argument -- in which he faced off against another first-timer by the name of John Roberts. Send us a question about the court at s…
S
SCOTUScast
1
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
21:53
21:53
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
21:53
The Supreme Court is considering a lawsuit between rock and roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation regarding Warhol’s works based on Goldsmith’s photo of the musician Prince. The fair use doctrine excuses from liability certain unlicensed uses of copyrighted works. The question before the Court in Warhol v. Goldsmith is whe…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021) Majority Opinion (Arizona, Voting Rights Act Section 2)
1:20:28
1:20:28
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:20:28
Audio of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021) In Arizona, voters can either vote in-person at a precinct or vote center – or they can receive a ballot by mail with various options for returning it. Arizona counties can choose either a vote center or a precinct-based system for voting in person. Counti…
S
SCOTUStalk
1
Can a web designer refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings?
14:35
14:35
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
14:35
On Dec. 5 the justices will hear oral argument in 303 Creative v. Elenis, a clash between free speech rights and LGBTQ rights. Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr joins Amy to explain the case and what to expect at oral argument. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. …
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Shoop v. Cunningham (Nov 14 2022) Justice Thomas Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari
29:31
29:31
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
29:31
Shoop v. Cunningham (Nov 14 2022) Justice Thomas Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari.Pippah Getchell による
S
SCOTUScast
1
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
19:52
19:52
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
19:52
In National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, the Supreme Court will address the dormant commerce clause in the context of a California law regarding the housing of farm animals. Specifically, the Court will decide "whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an int…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
McDonnell v. United States (2016) Majority Opinion (Honest-services Fraud, Bribery)
1:07:43
1:07:43
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:07:43
Audio of the Unanimous opinion of the Court in McDonnell v. United States (2016). Former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell, and his wife, Maureen McDonnell, were indicted on federal charges of honest services fraud and extortion charges after they accepted a total of $175,000 in loans, gifts, and other benefits from Virginia businessman Jonnie Wil…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Case Preview: Percoco v. United States (2022) (Honest-services Fraud, Bribery, Lobbying)
2:47
2:47
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
2:47
A quick case preview regarding an upcoming case before the Court this term: Percoco v. United States. "When a public official accepts money to convince the government to do something, we call him a crook. But when a private citizen accepts money to convince the government to do something, we call him a lobbyist." That's from the opening paragraph o…
S
SCOTUScast
1
Merrill v. Milligan - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
55:59
55:59
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
55:59
On October 4, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Merrill v. Milligan. Following the 2020 Census, the Alabama Legislature redrew its congressional district lines to account for shifts in the state’s population. With these new lines, only one of the state’s seven congressional districts was majority-minority. Several plaintiffs sued, …
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018) Majority Opinion (Free Exercise, Free Speech, Same-Sex Wedding Cake)
40:27
40:27
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
40:27
Audio of the 2018 Opinion of the Supreme Court in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. In July 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins were engaged to be married and busy making wedding plans. For their cake, they decided to ask Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, CO to create a custom-designed cake for their wedding receptio…
This episode, we look back on the show's first season in this selection of my favorite introductions. Enjoy! Music by Epidemic Sound Contact the ShowPippah Getchell による
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Buffington v. McDonough (Nov 7, 2022) Gorsuch Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (V.A. Benefits, Chevron Deference)
33:34
33:34
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
33:34
Audio of Buffington v. McDonough (Nov 7, 2022) Gorsuch Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (V.A. Benefits, Chevron Deference)Pippah Getchell による
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Anthony v. Louisiana (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Sotomayor Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Harmless-error, Structural-error, Prosecutor Testimony)
33:58
33:58
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
33:58
Audio of Anthony v. Louisiana (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Sotomayor Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Harmless-error, Structural-error, Prosecutor Testimony).Pippah Getchell による
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Clendening v. United States (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Thomas Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari (Injured Military Personnel, Federal Tort Claims Act)
8:45
8:45
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
8:45
Justice Thomas Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari in Clendening v. United States (Nov 7, 2022) Case Keywords: Injured Military Personnel, Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), Feres v. United States (1950), Feres doctrine, injury incident to military service, Camp Lejeune, U.S. Sovereign Immunity. Contact the Show Music and Sound Effects by Epidemic Soun…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Khorrami v. Arizona (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Gorsuch Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari (12 Member Jury, Right to Impartial Jury)
21:35
21:35
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
21:35
Audio of Justice Gorsuch Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari in Khorrami v. Arizona (November 7, 2022) On Monday, November 7th, the Court issued orders that included a long list of denials that, in turn, inspired five dissenting opinions from four justices. Two of the five dissents were penned by Justice Gorsuch - one of which dissented from the Cou…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Chinn v. Shoop (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Jackson Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari
5:22
5:22
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
5:22
Audio of Justice Jackson's dissent to denial of certiorari in Chinn v. Shoop (2022). On Monday, the Court issued orders that included a long list of denials which produced five different dissents - including Justice Jackson's first ever opinion as a Supreme Court Justice - dissenting to the denial of certiorari in Chinn v. Shoop (2022) Case Keyword…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Part 2: Baker v. Carr (1962) Majority Opinion (Political Question Doctrine; Apportionment; One Person, One Vote Cases)
58:50
58:50
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
58:50
We continue reading Baker v. Carr (1962) beginning with Part IV: Justiciability. Access this Supreme Court opinion and other essential case information here. Music by Epidemic SoundPippah Getchell による
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Part 1: Baker v. Carr (1962) Majority Opinion (Apportionment; Political Gerrymandering; One Person, One Vote Cases)
35:13
35:13
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
35:13
Last week, in episodes 74 and 75, I read the majority and dissenting opinions in the case Rucho v. Common Cause (2019). The majority held that political gerrymandering of congressional districts, as opposed to racial gerrymandering which is prohibited by Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, is a political question and thereby "nonjusticiable," or be…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Election Day Preview: Baker v. Carr (1962) Majority Opinion (One Person, One Vote Cases; Apportionment Justiciability, Gerrymandering)
3:55
3:55
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
3:55
Last week, in episodes 74 and 75, I read the majority and dissenting opinions in the case Rucho v. Common Cause (2019). The majority held that political gerrymandering of congressional districts, as opposed to racial gerrymandering which is prohibited by Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, is a political question and thereby "nonjusticiable," or be…
On Friday, June 24, the court ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Amy talks with abortion law scholar Mary Ziegler, professor of law at University of California, Davis, about the decision and what it means for those seeking abortion care across the country. Send us a quest…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Fisher v. University of Texas (2016) Majority Opinion (Affirmative Action, Race, University Admissions)
46:18
46:18
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
46:18
Audio of the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Fisher v. University of Texas (2016). The case I'll be reading today is similar to a 2003 case I read a couple of weeks ago, Grutter v. Bollinger. Both involved white females who had applied for admission to a particular university and were subsequently denied. In this case, Abigail Fisher applied f…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Morton v. Mancari (1974) Majority Opinion (Bureau of Indian Affairs, Employment Discrimination, Indian Reorganization Act)
34:05
34:05
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
34:05
Audio of the Supreme Court opinion in Morton v. Mancari (1974). Congress passed the Indian Reorganization Act in 1934. A provision in that law gave hiring preference Native Americans for positions in the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) to further the cause of Native American self-governance. But, when Congress passed the Equal Employment Opportunity…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994) Majority Opinion (Parody, Copyright, Fair Use, Pretty Woman)
47:47
47:47
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
47:47
Audio of the 1994 opinion of the Supreme Court in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Nearly sixty years later after it was first released, the opening bass riff in Roy Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" is recognizable to even the youngest generation of Americans, otherwise the rap group 2 Live Crew would have never created a parody of it in 1989 - that …
S
SCOTUScast
1
Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
35:18
35:18
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
35:18
Millions of dollars are at stake in a dispute over whether uncashed MoneyGrams qualify as “a money order, traveler’s check, or other similar written instrument (other than a third party bank check) on which a banking or financial organization or a business association is directly liable,” pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 2503, and therefore whether they sho…
This week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases challenging the use of racial preferences in college admissions at Harvard and The University of North Carolina. Your hosts do a deep dive into those arguments, pulling out the best, worst, and most interesting questions. GianCarlo then interviews Professor David Bernstein who filed an i…
S
SCOTUScast
1
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
1:05:29
1:05:29
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:05:29
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters regulated under the Clean Water Act known as “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). After decades of regulatory uncertainty, the Supreme Court has again taken up a case that may provide clarity. On October 3rd, the Court will hear oral argument in Sackett …
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Thomas v. Lumpkin (2022) Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Juror Bias, Impartial Jury)
29:17
29:17
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
29:17
Decided October 11, 2022. Thomas v. Lumpkin (ineffective assistance of counsel, juror bias, impartial jury). Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. Access this SCOTUS opinion here.Pippah Getchell による
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) Dissenting Opinion (Partisan Gerrymandering)
1:19:39
1:19:39
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:19:39
Audio of Justice Kagan's dissenting opinion in Rucho v. Common Cause (2019). Last episode, I read the 2019 majority opinion Rucho v. Common Cause - a case in which a three-judge District Court ruled that North Carolina's 2016 congressional district map was the product of Republican-directed partisan gerrymandering, enjoining the state from using th…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) Majority Opinion (Partisan Gerrymandering)
1:20:16
1:20:16
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:20:16
Audio of the 2019 opinion of the Supreme Court in Rucho v. Common Cause. A three-judge District Court ruled that North Carolina's 2016 congressional district map was the product of partisan gerrymandering, enjoining the state from using the map after November 2018. North Carolina Republicans appealed the decision to the Supreme Court. In a 5-4 opin…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (2022) Majority Opinion (Voter ID, Voting Rights Act)
43:53
43:53
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
43:53
Audio of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (2022). The NAACP challenged a state voter ID law arguing that it violated the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The North Carolina state attorney general, who happens to be a Democrat, was already defending the constitutionality of the…
It was another quiet week at the Court, but Justice Samuel Alito came to Heritage for our annual Joseph Story lecture. He sat down with John Malcolm and shared stories about his career and discussed topical issues like the leak of the draft Dobbs opinion and free speech on college campuses. Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please s…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Part 2: Citizens United v. FEC (2010) Majority Opinion (Campaign Finance, Fundraising, Federal Elections)
1:31:18
1:31:18
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:31:18
This episode, we continue reading the second half the 2010 opinion of the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Picking up where we ended last episode, we begin with Part III of the opinion. The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 or BCRA (BIK-rah) (even more commonly known as the McCain–Feingold Act) placed restrictio…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Part 1: Citizens United v. FEC (2010) Majority Opinion (Campaign Finance, Fundraising, Federal Elections)
47:56
47:56
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
47:56
Audio of the 2010 opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010). The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 or BCRA (bik-rah) - more commonly known as the McCain–Feingold Act, placed restrictions on federal campaign fundraising in an effort to regulate "big money" campaign contributions and prevent corru…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Part 2: Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Majority Opinion (Affirmative Action, Race)
37:15
37:15
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
37:15
This episode, we continue reading the 2003 opinion of the Court in Grutter v. Bollinger, starting with Part III. Access this SCOTUS opinion in full here.Pippah Getchell による
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Part 1: Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Majority Opinion (Affirmative Action, Race)
34:07
34:07
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
34:07
Audio of the opinion of the Court in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). The question before the court was whether the consideration of race in the University of Michigan Law School's admissions process violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a five-to-four decis…
S
SCOTUStalk
1
Affirmative action comes to the Supreme Court
37:54
37:54
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
37:54
On Oct. 31, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two cases challenging the race-conscious admissions programs of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina. Amy talks to lawyers on both sides of the dispute. David Hinojosa is the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under La…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015) Majority Opinion (elections clause, redistricting, gerrymandering, independent state legislature theory)
1:10:20
1:10:20
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
1:10:20
Audio of the 2015 opinion of the Court in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. If you are losing sleep over Moore v. Harper, the upcoming case that asks the Court to consider the constitutionality of the Independent State Legislature Theory, you'll be glad you listened to today's episode. That's because it prov…
S
SCOTUS 101
1
Special Episode: An Interview with V.P. Mike Pence
19:15
19:15
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
19:15
In this special episode, former Vice President Mike Pence joins your hosts to share some inside-baseball about the judicial selection and confirmation process. He also shares his thoughts about the role of the Court in our constitutional system, how Justice Thomas came to administer his oath of office, and his particular admiration for Justice Barr…
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell (1988) Unanimous Opinion (Parody, Public Figures, Free Speech)
29:57
29:57
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
29:57
Audio of the 1988 unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell. Hustler is a pornographic magazine whose founder, Larry Flint, wasn't one to shy away from tucking a little social and political commentary in-between photo layouts. In 1983, the magazine's lead story included a parody of a political ad claiming that the …
W
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
1
Fun Case: District of Columbia v. Wesby (2018) Unanimous Opinion (Probable Cause, Qualified Immunity)
40:34
40:34
「あとで再生する」
「あとで再生する」
リスト
気に入り
気に入った
40:34
Audio of the opinion of the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Wesby (2018). The two questions before the Court were: 1) whether the arresting officers had probable cause to arrest for unlawful entry under District law, despite a claim of good-faith entry, and 2) whether the law was sufficiently clearly-established to justify the denial of im…
