Technological Slavery - Reading # 7

TrueLife

https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US

Transcript:
Technological Slavery pdf
https://app.podscribe.ai/episode/58824685
Speaker 0 (0s):

Speaker 1 (19s): Welcome back, everybody let's jump right back in to Technological Slavery writing's of the Unabomber Human Race at a Crossroads we have gotten ahead of our story. It is one thing to develop in the laboratory, a series of psychological or biological techniques from manipulating human behavior and quite another to integrate these techniques into a functioning social system.

This to me brings to mind the Stanley Milgram experiments. For those of you on aware of the Stanley Milgram experiments, look up a Stanford prison experiment and Stanley Milgrim. I think you'll find it amazing. The latter problem is the more difficult of the two. For example, while the techniques of educational psychology doubtless works quite well in the lab schools, where they are developed, it is not necessarily easy to apply them effectively.

Throughout our educational system. We all know that many of our schools are alike. The teachers are too busy as of 1995, taking knives and guns away from the kids to subject them to the latest techniques for making them into computer nerds. Thus, in spite of all its technical advances relating to human behavior, the system to date has not been impressively successful in controlling human beings.

The people whose behavior is fairly well under the control of the system are those have the type that might be called booyah, but there are growing numbers of people who were in one way or another are rebels against the system. Welfare leeches, youth gangs, Colt, a Satanist Nazis, radical environmentalist's militiamen, et cetera. The system is currently engaged in a desperate struggle to overcome certain problems that threaten its survival among which the problems of human behavior are the most important.

If the system succeeds in acquiring sufficient control over human behavior quickly enough, it will probably survive. Otherwise it will break down. We think the issue will most likely be resolved within the next several decades, say 40 to a hundred years. Suppose the system survives the crisis of the next several decades. By that time, it will have to have solved or at least brought under control.

The principle problems that confront it in particular that have socializing human beings that is making people sufficiently docile so that their behavior no longer threatens the system that being accomplished. It does not appear that there would be any further obstacle to the development of technology. And it would presumably advanced toward its logical conclusion, which has complete control over everything on earth, including human beings and all other important organisms.

The system may become a unitary monolithic organization, or it may be more or less fragmented and consist of a number of organizations coexisting in a relationship that includes elements of both cooperation and competition just as today, the government, the corporations, and other large organizations, both cooperate and compete with one another human freedom mostly will have vanished because individuals and small groups will be impotent.

Vis-a-vis large organizations armed with super technology and an arsenal of advanced, psychological and biological tools for manipulating human beings, besides instruments of the surveillance and physical coercion. That's like the trifecta. You have technology over everyone. You have advanced psychological and biological tools.

Some say at the beginning of those biological tools, our in fact, this new vaccine coming your way only a small number of people will have any real power. And even these probably we'll have only very limited freedom because there are behavior too will be regulated just as today. Our politicians and our corporation executives can retain their positions of power. Only as long as their behavior remains within certain fairly narrow limits.

Don't imagine that the system will stop developing further techniques for controlling human beings and nature. Once the crisis of this next few decades is over and increasing control is no longer necessary for the system survival. On the contrary, once the hard times all Rover the system will increase its control over people and nature more rapidly because it will no longer be hampered by difficulties of the kind that it is currently experiencing.

Survival is not the principal motive for extending control. As we explained earlier, technicians and scientists carry on their work largely as a surrogate activity, that is they satisfy their need for power by solving technical problems. They will continue to do this with unabated enthusiasm and among the most interesting and challenging problems for them to solve will be those have understanding the humans, body and mind and intervening in their development for the quote unquote good of humanity, of course.

But suppose on the other hand that the stresses of the coming decades proved to be too much for the system. If the system breaks down, there may be a period of chaos, a time of troubles, such as those that history has recorded at various epochs in the past, it is impossible to predict what would emerge from such a time of troubles, but at any rate, the human race would be given a new chance.

The greatest danger is that industrial society may begin to reconstitute itself within the first few years after the breakdown. Certainly there will be many people, power hungry types, especially who we'll be anxious to get the factories running again. Therefore two tasks confront those who hate the servitude too, which the industrial system is reducing the human behavior.

First we must work to heighten the social stresses within the system. So as to increase the likelihood that it will break down or be weakened sufficiently so that a revolution against it becomes possible. Second, it is necessary to develop and propagate an ideology that opposes technology and the industrial system such an ideology can become the basis for a revolution against industrial society.

If and when the system becomes sufficiently weakened and in such an ideology will help to ensure that if and when industrial society breaks down, it's remanence will be smashed beyond repair so that the system cannot be reconstituted. The factories should be destroyed. Technical books, Bern,

Speaker 2 (8m 57s): You know, it brings me to a interesting point. Whenever someone brings up the burning burning books, the concept of history, if you look at the etymology of that word, his story history, his story, I think it's pretty profound history. His story, our written by the people who won the war.

When you win the war, you win the right to fundamentally record what happened, his story. Let's take it one step further. Everybody remembers hearing his story history about the burning of the library of Alexandria. On one hand, we have people who believe it was a tragedy.

It was a travesty to burn all the information collected and such a vast library. And there's no doubt on some level. It was that. However, I've always wondered. Why, why would they burn that down? Why would they burn books? People would burn books. 'cause they don't want that information in book's being out.

What if, what if is it possible that maybe in previous times the structure of society was a lot like the same day

Speaker 1 (10m 53s): It being proposed for our fut...