How a computer virus infected humanity

TrueLife

https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US

Transcript:
https://app.podscribe.ai/episode/54280251

Speaker 0 (0s): Did you hear about that new restaurant called karma? You get what you deserve. Thank you. Thank you. Welcome to the future. A future future. It's cracking out there where everybody, but you guys getting into have a good weekend. How's the weather. Nice. A warm, or is it raining where you are you part of that hurricane that's for me, it don't worry about me doing fine.

Live in the dream. As they say he was doing some thinking this whole fire is thing is pretty interesting. Isn't it? It got me thinking, what is the difference between a computer virus and a human virus? It seems to me that there's a lot of similarities, right? In some ways, in a lot of ways, the coronavirus has having the effect of mass hysteria.

It's causing people to act out of control. It's causing some people not to act at all. Same thing for a computer virus, right? It makes the computer just stopped. Sometimes that makes the computer act out of control. Both of them seem to want to hijack your data. One of them wants to hijack your DNA. No one wants to hack your passwords or your routing number.

Are your pictures or something like that. Right? Isn't it funny that we have some of the same people that work on computers trying to work on this virus or a lot of similarities. They're I'm just sayin I was talking to a friend of mine and he's got, I got an Apple computer. He's got a, like a Microsoft, he's got windows on his computer and his computer has a lot of problems.

Microsoft has a lot of viruses. That's interesting because bill Gates is they had a Microsoft, right? Well, isn't he also the head of like the world health organization, the CDC, if his computers have a lot of viruses, why would we trust him being in, being in charge of the coronavirus? Like he can't keep off his computer. He was going to keep them off for people.

Does it make any sense? He was an issue there to me. It seems there was a whole lot, a lot more going on behind the scenes. Obviously it's an election year and there's a lot of people that are jockeying for position utilize the different strategies to win. However, and after election day, I think regardless of who wins, the same strategy for the coronavirus is going to be an effect.

As far as the vaccine goes, when it comes to the wall street, both sides have there team have winners that they are going to funnel all the taxpayer money to, to win. However, when it comes to the vaccine, both camps are adamant about you getting that vaccine. That's the real deal. I mean, the real distraction is to keep your mind off of that. I don't think people need a vaccine and if you need a vaccine than go get it.

But when you talk about forcing people to take a vaccine, you are talking about something that has that the very least some sinister undertones. I left to go on to the world health, the organization website, and listening to some of their podcasts and what they got going on. And there's a team of people currently in Switzerland that are working on a package, support vaccination identification, and they bring up some interesting points that I think everybody should be aware of.

One of them is that they want anyone who flies on a plane to be, to have this vaccine documentation. There's a lot of issues with that. That's where the whole chip thing comes in. You know, they have this quantum dot or they have this RFID chip that will allow you to get on a plane, go into a sports stadium or go to work.

However, no one wants that. And not only do people not want it, but it's in my opinion, I think that it is it's unethical. Right? Good to understand the grand scheme of things, where smart cities want to be able to track people, smart cities want to be able to have your ID. Smart cities want to be able to have your bank accounts. Smart cities want to be able to have all that information on a small chip in your body.

Now you can just walk around and doors will open for you. Not only that, but also I think there's a lot of technology isle right now that it depends on that. Think the future of healthcare is being inside your body. They want to have these, these RFID chips that wood, you know, send a alert to a hospital. If your blood pressure was high or send an alert, if your blood sugar dropped somewhere or send an alert to a computer or to an AI system somewhere to make sure that your Okay I, on some level, I can understand the beauty of that.

That's that's awesome. But what, at what expense, at what expense, if you think about it from a logistics point of view, think about how much money they would save in healthcare. If they didn't have to have you come in all the time, if they could monitor you from afar. If instead of having doctors, they just had an AI system, you know, prescribe you, drugs are prescribed to you treatment.

You could do a way with so much of Docker's and then that would completely do away with so much schooling for people. And they could find other professions that's on the utopia side, right? So let's rewind it back and talk about some other unethical issues. So let's say that the first people that get a vaccine are the people that need at most.

And from, from what I read. And I also try to utilize the maximum of believe, none of what you hear and a half of what you read. So you should probably believe none of this since you are hearing it. However, I believe half of it. So here we go. Let's say that the people they get the vaccine or the people that are most are in danger of getting coven. And from what I've read, that appears to be minorities, people with underlying conditions and like homeless people are the poor people.

And that's at least what's what I'm hearing in the United States. So let's say that there is negative side effects from the vaccine, those of the people that are going to see all those side effects. First, the people that are already hurting people that are already in danger, they will see the most rapid side effects. If you read the literature, it also talks about once people get the vaccine, then they will be monitored closely.

And there is a term for it's called. It might have to come back and say Cause, I don't remember exactly what it was called. It's like pharmacol, pharmacological going to have to come back. I don't remember it. It's like pharmacological surveillance. And if you look up that word, you'll see that its it's being tracked well, were going to work.

How do you know that there's going to be any side effects on this particular vaccine while were going to utilize the process of farmer pharmacological surveillance. Okay. What's that? Well, that's us tracking him. Well, how are you going to track them? Oh, what? We're going to have a small RFID chip. That'll send us a signal. So when you started digging into the literature about what the vaccine is, the vaccine is a chip. It's a implantable device that allows you and everyone who gets the vaccine to be volunteered into phase four clinical trials, have the vaccine.

Do you see that's where the unethical part comes in. Imagine being someone that gets the vaccine while a lot of people don't have it. Don't you think that it would be some sort of stigma about that person? Like, do you, Oh, you got the chip in you. Oh man, I don't want to be around you or, Oh, you got the ship. That must be, and you have it. That must mean you have COVID so I don't want to be around you. I think one big issue there thinking about right now is this certain stigma about having this disease. I've also hea...