Artwork

コンテンツは Catherine Carr and David Runciman によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Catherine Carr and David Runciman またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作権で保護された作品をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Player FM -ポッドキャストアプリ
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!

Michael Lewis on the Pandemic

46:30
 
シェア
 

Manage episode 291757169 series 1672473
コンテンツは Catherine Carr and David Runciman によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Catherine Carr and David Runciman またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作権で保護された作品をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

We talk to Michael Lewis about his new book The Premonition, which tells the story of the people who saw the pandemic coming and asks why they couldn't get a hearing. It's a tale of short-term failures and long-term trends in US government and it follows on from his previous book about the risks America has been running in hollowing out the administrative state. A sobering account with glimmers of hope for the future.


Talking Points:


Old timers at the CDC say that things began to change after the 1976 swine flu outbreak.

  • The CDC rushed a vaccine program, and some people got sick. Then the swine flu basically vanished.
  • After that, under Reagan, the head of the CDC became an appointed, political job. This made the CDC overall more political and less independent.
  • Most people who interacted with the CDC before this pandemic realized that it wasn’t very good at managing disease.

Doing a public health job well carries a high risk of getting fired.

  • The experts in Michael’s story are consistently right about the trajectory of the disease; but they are often wrong about politics.
  • Should experts pay more attention to politics?
  • Experts can create discomfort for politicians, or they can give them cover—but that’s not their job. Michael thinks that politicians should be providing cover for the experts.

Why was it so hard to learn from the experiences of other cities in the heart of the crisis?

  • In the 1918 pandemic, the difference between Philadelphia and St. Louis was the timing of the intervention.
  • It’s hard to see the effect of the interventions in the fog of battle.
  • The failure of testing in the US at the start of the pandemic meant that there was no way to identify where the virus was.
  • Just-in-time manufacturing and taut-supply changes made the ‘health industrial complex’ less able to respond quickly.
  • Will the pandemic make Americans care more about how the government actually functions?

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

  continue reading

380 つのエピソード

Artwork

Michael Lewis on the Pandemic

TALKING POLITICS

21 subscribers

published

iconシェア
 
Manage episode 291757169 series 1672473
コンテンツは Catherine Carr and David Runciman によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Catherine Carr and David Runciman またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作権で保護された作品をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal

We talk to Michael Lewis about his new book The Premonition, which tells the story of the people who saw the pandemic coming and asks why they couldn't get a hearing. It's a tale of short-term failures and long-term trends in US government and it follows on from his previous book about the risks America has been running in hollowing out the administrative state. A sobering account with glimmers of hope for the future.


Talking Points:


Old timers at the CDC say that things began to change after the 1976 swine flu outbreak.

  • The CDC rushed a vaccine program, and some people got sick. Then the swine flu basically vanished.
  • After that, under Reagan, the head of the CDC became an appointed, political job. This made the CDC overall more political and less independent.
  • Most people who interacted with the CDC before this pandemic realized that it wasn’t very good at managing disease.

Doing a public health job well carries a high risk of getting fired.

  • The experts in Michael’s story are consistently right about the trajectory of the disease; but they are often wrong about politics.
  • Should experts pay more attention to politics?
  • Experts can create discomfort for politicians, or they can give them cover—but that’s not their job. Michael thinks that politicians should be providing cover for the experts.

Why was it so hard to learn from the experiences of other cities in the heart of the crisis?

  • In the 1918 pandemic, the difference between Philadelphia and St. Louis was the timing of the intervention.
  • It’s hard to see the effect of the interventions in the fog of battle.
  • The failure of testing in the US at the start of the pandemic meant that there was no way to identify where the virus was.
  • Just-in-time manufacturing and taut-supply changes made the ‘health industrial complex’ less able to respond quickly.
  • Will the pandemic make Americans care more about how the government actually functions?

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

  continue reading

380 つのエピソード

すべてのエピソード

×
 
Loading …

プレーヤーFMへようこそ!

Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。 これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。 全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。

 

クイックリファレンスガイド