Artwork

コンテンツは Benjamin Day and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW, Benjamin Day, and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Benjamin Day and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW, Benjamin Day, and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作権で保護された作品をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Player FM -ポッドキャストアプリ
Player FMアプリでオフラインにしPlayer FMう!

Week of Action: Expand Medicare!

29:11
 
シェア
 

Manage episode 297629784 series 2606115
コンテンツは Benjamin Day and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW, Benjamin Day, and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Benjamin Day and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW, Benjamin Day, and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作権で保護された作品をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Congress has an opportunity to make real steps towards Medicare for All this week. We go over the 4 proposed reforms that would expand Medicare, what’s at play and what’s at stake, the opposition to Medicare Expansion - if you can believe it - there IS opposition to giving seniors dental care - and what you can do to help pressure our legislators to fight! Show Notes Ben in Boston and international correspondent Stephanie in Denmark discuss the proposal to substantially expand and improve Medicare that's moving through Congress right now. As part of the negotiations around the American Families Plan, there are four demands: Lower the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 60, which would add 23 million people to Medicare coverage. (Lowering to 50 would add 60 million people, and lowering it to zero would be even better, but reducing it by just five years would be a huge victory, lowering overall healthcare spending in the U.S. and lowering employer healthcare spending by almost 15%. This will be the hardest of the four demands to achieve, but the one that would affect the most Americans.Add hearing, dental, and vision to Medicare, improving the program for existing Medicare beneficiaries, a huge number of whom are going without needed care. Of Medicare recipients, 75% who need a hearing aid don't have one, 70% haven't gone to the dentist in the last year, and 50% didn't get an eye exam. Create a cap on out-of-pocket costs. Most health insurance has a cap on out-of-pocket expenses, but traditional Medicare doesn't. This is wonky and less exciting for politicians because while it will save a lot of people a lot of money, it's not as tangible a benefit as adding hearing, dental, and vision. Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Medicare has been prohibited by law from negotiating drug prices for decades, forcing Americans to pay up to triple what other nations pay for the same pharmaceuticals. Negotiating with the pharmaceutical industry would save Medicare up to $450 billion over ten years, paying for all of the above expansions. Calls for expansion are building not just from the grassroots from within Congress. Letters from members of the House and the Senate (signed by many Democrats including centrists who aren't traditional Medicare for All supporters) have already been sent to President Biden, pressuring him to include expansion in the American Families Plan. Calls for expansion are coming from inside Congress! (Image description: surprised looking cat, with caption "the call is coming from inside the house!!!") We have some (very cynical) theories about these odd bedfellows: The centrist Democrats who signed on aren't deeply in the pocket of the healthcare industry, but they are avoiding Medicare for All because they perceive it as a liability in their district.They are in the pocket of one particular branch of the healthcare industry (but not pharma); they think it could help hospitals or insurance companies. They are signing the letter but don't think it will pass, and are happy to throw these provisions under the bus behind closed doors. All of the Above These expansion reforms both bring us closer to Medicare for All, and help us divide and conquer the healthcare industry; this proposal takes on Big Pharma, but mostly leaves the insurance and hospital industries alone. But is it working? Currently the opposition to expanding and improving Medicare is coming from the usual suspects, under the umbrella of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future, the evil transformer of insurers, pharma giants, and hospitals. They've even managed to find (some really bad) ways to argue against giving dental care to seniors. Dental coverage wasn't even a thing in 1965 when Medicare was passed, so seniors don't need it!38% of Medicare beneficiaries already receive dental coverage through (privately administered, for-profit) Medicare Advantage, so the rest don't really need it!
  continue reading

91 つのエピソード

Artwork

Week of Action: Expand Medicare!

Medicare for All

35 subscribers

published

iconシェア
 
Manage episode 297629784 series 2606115
コンテンツは Benjamin Day and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW, Benjamin Day, and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャスト コンテンツは、Benjamin Day and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW, Benjamin Day, and Stephanie Nakajima - Healthcare-NOW またはそのポッドキャスト プラットフォーム パートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作権で保護された作品をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal
Congress has an opportunity to make real steps towards Medicare for All this week. We go over the 4 proposed reforms that would expand Medicare, what’s at play and what’s at stake, the opposition to Medicare Expansion - if you can believe it - there IS opposition to giving seniors dental care - and what you can do to help pressure our legislators to fight! Show Notes Ben in Boston and international correspondent Stephanie in Denmark discuss the proposal to substantially expand and improve Medicare that's moving through Congress right now. As part of the negotiations around the American Families Plan, there are four demands: Lower the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 60, which would add 23 million people to Medicare coverage. (Lowering to 50 would add 60 million people, and lowering it to zero would be even better, but reducing it by just five years would be a huge victory, lowering overall healthcare spending in the U.S. and lowering employer healthcare spending by almost 15%. This will be the hardest of the four demands to achieve, but the one that would affect the most Americans.Add hearing, dental, and vision to Medicare, improving the program for existing Medicare beneficiaries, a huge number of whom are going without needed care. Of Medicare recipients, 75% who need a hearing aid don't have one, 70% haven't gone to the dentist in the last year, and 50% didn't get an eye exam. Create a cap on out-of-pocket costs. Most health insurance has a cap on out-of-pocket expenses, but traditional Medicare doesn't. This is wonky and less exciting for politicians because while it will save a lot of people a lot of money, it's not as tangible a benefit as adding hearing, dental, and vision. Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Medicare has been prohibited by law from negotiating drug prices for decades, forcing Americans to pay up to triple what other nations pay for the same pharmaceuticals. Negotiating with the pharmaceutical industry would save Medicare up to $450 billion over ten years, paying for all of the above expansions. Calls for expansion are building not just from the grassroots from within Congress. Letters from members of the House and the Senate (signed by many Democrats including centrists who aren't traditional Medicare for All supporters) have already been sent to President Biden, pressuring him to include expansion in the American Families Plan. Calls for expansion are coming from inside Congress! (Image description: surprised looking cat, with caption "the call is coming from inside the house!!!") We have some (very cynical) theories about these odd bedfellows: The centrist Democrats who signed on aren't deeply in the pocket of the healthcare industry, but they are avoiding Medicare for All because they perceive it as a liability in their district.They are in the pocket of one particular branch of the healthcare industry (but not pharma); they think it could help hospitals or insurance companies. They are signing the letter but don't think it will pass, and are happy to throw these provisions under the bus behind closed doors. All of the Above These expansion reforms both bring us closer to Medicare for All, and help us divide and conquer the healthcare industry; this proposal takes on Big Pharma, but mostly leaves the insurance and hospital industries alone. But is it working? Currently the opposition to expanding and improving Medicare is coming from the usual suspects, under the umbrella of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future, the evil transformer of insurers, pharma giants, and hospitals. They've even managed to find (some really bad) ways to argue against giving dental care to seniors. Dental coverage wasn't even a thing in 1965 when Medicare was passed, so seniors don't need it!38% of Medicare beneficiaries already receive dental coverage through (privately administered, for-profit) Medicare Advantage, so the rest don't really need it!
  continue reading

91 つのエピソード

すべてのエピソード

×
 
Loading …

プレーヤーFMへようこそ!

Player FMは今からすぐに楽しめるために高品質のポッドキャストをウェブでスキャンしています。 これは最高のポッドキャストアプリで、Android、iPhone、そしてWebで動作します。 全ての端末で購読を同期するためにサインアップしてください。

 

クイックリファレンスガイド