Court of Appeals Agrees USDA Did Not Have the Discretion to Implement New Program Benefiting Farmers

Maryland Risk Management Education Podcast

コンテンツは Maryland Risk Management Education Podcast and Paul Goeringer によって提供されます。エピソード、グラフィック、ポッドキャストの説明を含むすべてのポッドキャストコンテンツは、Maryland Risk Management Education Podcast and Paul Goeringer またはそのポッドキャストプラットフォームパートナーによって直接アップロードされ、提供されます。誰かがあなたの著作権で保護された作品をあなたの許可なく使用していると思われる場合は、ここで概説されているプロセスに従うことができますhttps://ja.player.fm/legal。

5y ago 7:52

MP4•エピソードのホーム

In this episode, Paul provides an update on a case involving Colorado winter wheat producers who requested actual production history yield exclusion in 2015 but the USDA Risk Management Agency denied the request. The case highlights when USDA potentially has to make new programs available to producers.

Materials discussed in this episode:

Ausmus v. Perdue, 289 F.Supp.3d 1227 (D. Colo. 2018)
Ausmus v. Perdue, 908 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 2018).
Goeringer, Paul, Court of Appeals Agrees USDA Did Not Have the Discretion to Implement New Program Benefiting Farmers (AREC, March 19, 2019).
Goeringer, Paul, Updated: Quick Look at Yield Exclusion Option in 2014 Farm Bill (AREC, July 13, 2015).
Goeringer, Paul, USDA Did Not Have Discretion to Implement New Program Benefitting Farmers: When Does the Agency Have Discretion to Implement a New Program? (AREC, July 12, 2018).

If you have questions for Paul contact him at lgoering@umd.edu, tweet him @aglawPaul or 301-405-3541.

139 つのエピソード